data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54494/54494b32079e76f5b55fd382b204bc830dd9912f" alt="Top of page" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64ad9/64ad947fc28cefddb7d2f4f3dff4912d6132312e" alt="Previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f051c/f051cd1a674e12ab1cca20326bd06d2bcc5abe98" alt="Next message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97765/977658c32de5072b4434c594ddc7cf52c6e0f20a" alt="Link to this message"
Anonymous
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Thursday, August 28, 2003 - 6:07 pm: | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7ca2/e7ca226f5d566ab46e4ecb39794bd327ce785b7e" alt="Edit Post" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4389/e4389c6fdc03bf15404b7e3403783a737d4a3f9b" alt="Delete Post" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d440/6d44025490a68ee7d2c46eab183fd114bead2888" alt="View Post/Check IP" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd0b7/fd0b77c0ae6c524f780559ba30043a118996f0d3" alt="Print Post" |
I haven't seen satisfactory 3D lenticular images. Is it becuase lenticular meterials have limitation to separating large parallax? I believe they usually use multiple images of different angles,say left 1, left 2, right 1, right 2 ,etc. When left 1 and right 2 are merged in anaglyph method, it produces a satisfactory 3D image, but when it comes to lenticular method they combine left1 and right 1 resulting in less impressive 3D effect. So I think such is caused by the inability of lenticular materials to separate images of parallax value large enough to produce a satisfactory 3D effect. Please enlighten me about it. |