Author |
Message |
Alexander Oest
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Friday, November 14, 2003 - 2:10 pm: | |
According to this article http://www.pcworld.dk/default.asp?Mode=2&ArtikelID=4753 (in Danish), Toshiba Matsushita Display have demonstrated a new LCD monitor with a response time of 5.5 milliseconds (rather than the usual 16-24) at the FPD International Fair. They use a so-called optically-compensated bond technology. It might take some time before it hits the shelves, but some time in the future, such monitors might replace the CRTs of today for shutter glasses use. That is, unless they buffer the signal like the projectors do, destroying the sync between page-flipping and shutters. Couldn't find more information on it in English, and it might never appear, but I thought I'd share anyway. Alex |
V.S.
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Saturday, November 15, 2003 - 4:26 pm: | |
As I know 5-6 is not enough, should be not more than 2 to have stereo |
M.H.
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Sunday, November 16, 2003 - 3:53 pm: | |
0.0055 s should give aprox 200 Hz ... It looks O.K. on the firest view ... |
Vasily
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Thursday, November 20, 2003 - 9:08 am: | |
To avoid artefacts at 100 Hz stereo image, i.e. at T1 = 10 ms frame time, it is necessary to have relaxation time T2 of display (of its pixel) esentiall smaller (i.e. T2 no more 2-3 ms) in compare with pointed frame time. Otherwise artefacts (false image) will take place on essential square S of the display screen ( S is proportional T2/T1). I.e., at T2 = 5,5 ms (as in pointed Toshiba screen) artefacts will take place at half on the screen at 100 Hz. Really, it is necessary to shorten relaxation time of LCD really up to 2 ms to have good results at 100 Hz stereo image. |
Anonymous
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Wednesday, July 20, 2005 - 8:23 pm: | |
What a great web site... |
|