Author |
Message |
Drayzen
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Friday, December 07, 2001 - 2:46 pm: | |
Just wondering how it compares to the NVIDIA Stereo? Worth the $ or a waste of money??? |
Christoph Bungert (Admin)
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Saturday, December 08, 2001 - 10:18 am: | |
EyeSCREAM Pro I don't have it, but as far as I know the story goes like this: (correct me if I'm wrong) Advantages: - supports most VGA-chipsets - supports H3D-glasses and compatibles (color code) - doesn't have the IRQ/DDC-conflict problems as nVidia & ELSA - supports Win2000 Disadvantages: - half-resolution only - requires sync-doubler glasses - OpenGL only! no Direct3D Christoph |
Christoph Bungert (Admin)
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Saturday, December 08, 2001 - 10:30 am: | |
You may wonder what the difference between the eyeSCREAM versions is (again correct me if I'm wrong). eyeSCREAM light: OpenGL only, red/blue-glasses only, Win2k-support, sold as stand-alone product for $14,95 eyeSCREAM Pro: OpenGL only, sync-doubler shutterglasses only, Win2k-support, sold as stand-alone product for $14,95 eyeSCREAM 2000: Direct3D, Glide, OpenGL, sync-doubler shutterglasses only, no Win2k-support, OEM-product, not sold seperately, updates on wicked3d.com site require installation CD in drive All of them support Win95/98/Me. None of them supports WinXP. Christoph |
Anonymous
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Wednesday, July 20, 2005 - 8:10 pm: | |
Hi, I really apreciated this website! Thanks |
|